Comments on "Intuition"
The following refers to the blog entry, Arguing by Intuition, Part 1:
Your latest post "Arguing by Intuition, Part 1" was very interesting. While this is completely out of the precise subject you are dealing with, I hope that in the near future you can comment on this portion of Ganssle's remark:
"If determinism is true, then no action is up to the one who does it. At least no action is up to the one who does it to a high enough degree to make it reasonable to hold the person responsible. Yet we do hold each other morally responsible. The best explanation is that some actions are up to us and we are responsible for them."
I am subscribed to your feed through Atom, it has been very interesting this far. I will continue reading your contributions. Thanks.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Yes, although I originally planned only two articles for "Intuition," afterwards I also thought that it would be a good idea to address the portion you quoted, at least to briefly state what's wrong with it. So this will probably appear as part 3 of "Intuition."
Again, thanks for writing, and please tell your friends.
March 11 2005 | Apologetics, Philosophy, Theology